Skip to main content

RT Makes Repeated False Claim Ukraine Supporting Terrorists in Africa

The Claim:

RT alleges that Ukrainian intelligence is using embassies to covertly move weapons, drones and “military instructors” to terrorist/opposition groups across Africa (Mali, Sudan, DRC, CAR, Chad), including supplying ADF jihadists; that the Ukrainian Embassy in Kinshasa is a logistics hub; that Mauritania is a transit route; and that Ukrainian specialists train Colombian mercenaries bound for Sudan via a company called Forward Observations Group—citing Alexander Ivanov of the “Officers Union for International Security” and remarks at the UN by Russian diplomat Dmitry Polyanskiy.

The Facts:

  1. Article sourcing comes from sanctioned Wagner/Africa Corps proxies and Russian officials, not independent evidence.
    Alexander Ivanov and his “Officers Union for International Security (OUIS)” are documented Wagner front entities—sanctioned by the EU, U.S., and U.K.—used to brand Russian mercenaries in CAR and elsewhere. Claims from Ivanov to TASS/RT are therefore stakeholder allegations, not neutral reporting.

  2. Ukraine’s Africa activity that is on record is state-to-state diplomacy and training—not arming jihadists.
    Kyiv opened new embassies (e.g., Mauritania, DRC) and has publicly offered training to Mauritania’s armed forces, as reported by Reuters and confirmed by Ukraine’s MFA. This is the opposite of covert support to terrorists.

  3. Mali/Tuareg rebel battlefield episode: contested, not proof of “terrorism.”
    In 2024, Ukraine’s military intelligence claimed it provided intelligence aiding Tuareg rebels against Wagner in Mali; Bamako and Niamey cut ties with Kyiv, while Ukraine denied supplying drones or training jihadists. This is a political/diplomatic dispute—not independent confirmation that Ukraine arms Al-Qaeda affiliates.

  4. ADF drones: UN reporting notes ADF acquired drones—but none of it ties to Ukraine.
    Uganda’s Daily Monitor summarized a UN report that ADF has “killer drones,” yet no credible source attributes those drones to Ukraine. The “Ukraine-to-ADF” line appears only in Russian state or echo outlets.

  5. Colombian mercenaries in Sudan: evidence points to UAE-linked recruitment—not Ukraine.
    AP, WSJ and Al Jazeera report Colombian mercenaries fighting for Sudan’s RSF allegedly via UAE-backed channels; none implicates Ukraine directing or training them. RT’s “FOG-in-Moldova” story is unsubstantiated in reputable reporting.

  6. Mauritania flatly denied being a Ukraine arms corridor.
    Nouakchott officially rejected claims its territory funnels Ukrainian weapons to Sahel militants—calling them baseless and unsupported.


Narrative Context:

  • Playbook: This piece fits a longstanding Kremlin storyline: label Ukraine a “terrorist state”; launder allegations through Wagner/Africa Corps fronts (OUIS/Ivanov) and UN sound bites; invert scrutiny away from Russia’s own mercenary abuses in the Sahel.
  • Why now?: As Wagner rebrands under Africa Corps and faces scrutiny for alleged atrocities, blaming Kyiv for “destabilizing Africa” helps justify Russia’s presence and erode Ukraine’s outreach to African partners.

The article’s central claims rely on one-side sources (Ivanov/OUIS; Russian UN mission; TASS/RT) with no corroborating evidence from independent outlets or UN panels. Where verifiable facts exist, they contradict RT’s framing (e.g., Ukraine’s official training offer to Mauritania’s military, Mauritania’s denial of arms-transit, and reputable reporting that UAE-linked networks—not Ukraine—drive Colombian mercenary flows to Sudan). This is propaganda by allegation, designed to stigmatize Ukraine and sanitize Russia’s own paramilitary footprint in Africa.

https://archive.is/icOLd